(;GM[1]FF[4]CA[UTF-8]AP[WebGoBoard:0.10.11]ST[2]RU[japanese]SZ[19]KM[6.5]HA[0]TM[45:00 + 00:30(5) ByoYomi]RE[B+Resign]DT[2020-10-03]PB[rubicon]BR[6d]PW[riemsdijk]WR[1d]EV[Free game]PC[The KGS Go Server at http://www.gokgs.com/]US[riemsdijk[1d]]C[riemsdijk [1d?\]: have a good game :)
rubicon [6d?\]: hi, thanks, you too
riemsdijk [1d?\]: have a good game :)
rubicon [6d?\]: hi, thanks, you too
];B[qd];W[cc];B[pq];W[cq];B[ed];W[de];B[ee];W[df];B[dc];W[db];B[cd];W[dd];B[ec];W[bc];B[fg];W[eh];B[fh];W[ei];B[fi];W[ej];B[ef];W[dg];B[do];W[ep];B[eo];W[fp];B[cp];W[bq];B[fo];W[gp];B[cl];W[bk];B[ck];W[cj];B[dj];W[ci];B[gk];W[el];B[go];W[hp];B[nd];W[po];B[qm];W[qq];B[mq];W[pp];B[pr]C[rubicon [6d?\]: but its hard to say
](;W[mp];B[lp]C[rubicon [6d?\]: you should counter hane
](;W[lo];B[kp];W[ko];B[jp](;W[jo]C[rubicon [6d?\]: at o3
];B[np];W[mo];B[om];W[no]C[rubicon [6d?\]: i think n4 is very good
];B[ro]C[rubicon [6d?\]: but the following moves werent so good
];W[lc];B[jc];W[pd];B[pe];W[od];B[oe];W[nc];B[md];W[qc];B[mc];W[rd];B[qe];W[oc];B[mb];W[re];B[pb];W[pc];B[rf];W[qb];B[ho];W[mk];B[mm];W[lm];B[ll]C[rubicon [6d?\]: so maybe a different variation from the start
];W[ml];B[nm];W[km];B[jl];W[kl];B[lk];W[lj];B[kk];W[jk];B[kj];W[ik];B[li];W[mj];B[mi];W[fk];B[gm];W[gj];B[hk];W[hj];B[il];W[ki];B[jj];W[ij];B[ji];W[hl];B[gl];W[im];B[hm];W[jm];B[hl];W[kh];B[jh];W[fj];B[em];W[dm];B[cm];W[dl];B[dn];W[fl];B[io];W[ip];B[fm];W[ni];B[kg];W[lh];B[mh];W[lg];B[mg];W[lf]C[rubicon [6d?\]: mostly, the weakness of the w group on the lower right allowed me to build the moyo
riemsdijk [1d?\]: perhaps I should have digged deeper into your moyo
];B[mf];W[jg];B[ih];W[hh];B[ig];W[hg];B[if];W[hf];B[ie];W[in];B[bn]C[rubicon [6d?\]: yes, i think the bottom right didnt turn out too good for you
](;W[he];B[nq];W[rp];B[qo];W[qp];B[rr];W[qr];B[qs];W[jq];B[kr];W[jr];B[kq];W[pn];B[pm];W[or];B[oq];W[lr];B[ks];W[id];B[jd];W[mn];B[kn];W[rl];B[rm];W[qn];B[rn];W[qk];B[ok];W[oj];B[pj];W[pk];B[nl];W[nj];B[pi];W[qg];B[pg];W[qh];B[ph];W[qf];B[rj];W[hc];B[hb];W[gb];B[ic];W[hd];B[ib];W[fc]C[riemsdijk [1d?\]: ty for the game
rubicon [6d?\]: thanks
riemsdijk [1d?\]: I knew I should havce bailed out of the attack earlier
riemsdijk [1d?\]: but it did not seem enough
])(;W[nq]C[rubicon [6d?\]: yes, you should just live with o3
riemsdijk [1d?\]: this one should be fine, I thjink
rubicon [6d?\]: yes, i agree
rubicon [6d?\]: ah, i see
rubicon [6d?\]: but i see you play many correspondace games on OGS
rubicon [6d?\]: you are 6d there, right?
riemsdijk [1d?\]: I've stopped, but corerespondence is another thing enterely
rubicon [6d?\]: yes, you can place the stones on a real board and you have at least a day
riemsdijk [1d?\]: for me it's a lot easier to focus in a single move then in a whole game
riemsdijk [1d?\]: over the internet that is
riemsdijk [1d?\]: and if you look through my games I still make a lot of silly mistakes
rubicon [6d?\]: we all do :)
rubicon [6d?\]: i think if you live with o3 its better than the game but still black is ahead by 20+
riemsdijk [1d?\]: this is actually quite painful locally for b
rubicon [6d?\]: yes, i expected it immediatelly (after i played j5)
riemsdijk [1d?\]: I was looking at it but at the time it did not seem like a big deal
riemsdijk [1d?\]: I wonder what would be best, just take 33, perhaps?
rubicon [6d?\]: its enough to have sente
](;B[nr]C[rubicon [6d?\]: we played a bit fast
riemsdijk [1d?\]: I hate to play over the internet, so for me, at least, bluitz is the only way to go
];W[lq];B[oq](;W[jq];B[he]C[rubicon [6d?\]: m2 might be better than k3
])(;W[lr]C[riemsdijk [1d?\]: true
rubicon [6d?\]: in any case, i think i still had enough points, the center was too big
riemsdijk [1d?\]: yes =/
]))(;B[qp];W[nr]C[rubicon [6d?\]: i would atari and sacrifice the 3 stones
])))(;W[qj]C[riemsdijk [1d?\]: but here usuallly pincer, yes
rubicon [6d?\]: i think they are good moves
rubicon [6d?\]: but some of the followups maybe not ideal, but im not sure where to play either
]))(;W[nq]C[O3O2O4M2M5L4rubicon [6d?\]: O3 O2 O4 M2 M5 L4 
rubicon [6d?\]: seems safer but idk
riemsdijk [1d?\]: hmnn I've never seen o3 before in this joseki so id did not ever cross my mind
rubicon [6d?\]: you can also pincer the r7 stone, but i forget
rubicon [6d?\]: this joseki can get quite complicated
riemsdijk [1d?\]: everytime I've checked with AI it recomends m5
rubicon [6d?\]: i dislike the joseki for w
];B[nr];W[np];B[lr];W[lo];B[kp](;W[qj]C[O4])(;W[ko]C[rubicon [6d?\]: AI also recommend O4 as the first move
];B[jp];W[qj]C[rubicon [6d?\]: but i always forget, i think any contact move is good
])))(;W[ro]C[riemsdijk [1d?\]: I don't like this variation it feels way too passive
O4])(;W[np]C[riemsdijk [1d?\]: yes, I've seen o4 recently
rubicon [6d?\]: again, i dont like it for w
rubicon [6d?\]: which is why i play it as b :)
riemsdijk [1d?\]: I've always like the n4 variation
R6riemsdijk [1d?\]: but k5 might have been too much, yes
rubicon [6d?\]: my response is always R6 as w
riemsdijk [1d?\]: this one I really don't like
riemsdijk [1d?\]: feels way too passive
riemsdijk [1d?\]: I've already taken too much in the left, can't afford to be passive
rubicon [6d?\]: right
rubicon [6d?\]: anyway, thanks again for the game
]))